Firm-then-soften-then-stabilize… say that 10 times fast!

As reported in Townsend’s EVA Market Intelligence Monthly, China’s EVA market moved in a choppy “firm-then-soften-then-stabilize” pattern in January, with the price center edging up from December even though momentum proved fragile. Early-month indications firmed on pre-holiday restocking and a policy-driven sentiment boost from the photovoltaic (PV) chain, but the rebound struggled to extend once buying tapered. As incremental domestic supply became more visible and profit-taking emerged, spot discussions eased back before settling into a tighter, range-bound consolidation toward late January as the market digested new policy signals and near-term supply/demand temporarily rebalanced.

The first catalyst was demand-led and timing-specific. Ahead of the Chinese New Year holiday (February 15–23, 2026), logistics constraints and routine inventory planning encouraged converters and traders to cover prompt needs, particularly in PV-linked grades and some traditional applications. A trader in East China remarked: “When the policy headline hit, buyers rushed to lock in some volumes for PV film—mostly short-cycle coverage, but enough to lift the tone for a week.”

Policy news amplified that early firmness. On January 8, China’s Ministry of Finance and State Taxation Administration announced adjustments to export tax rebate policies, including a move to cancel VAT export rebates for certain photovoltaic-related products effective April 1, 2026, which quickly warmed market psychology in the domestic PV value chain. Market participants broadly interpreted the change as a near-term driver for a “rush-export” window in Q1—supportive for module output planning, PV film orders, and consequently EVA feedstock procurement—though many also cautioned that the effect would be front-loaded rather than structural.

That said, the policy-driven uplift ran into two immediate constraints: profit-taking and the market’s underlying supply trajectory. As prices ticked up, some sellers moved to monetize the bounce, increasing spot offers and prompting a round of “sell-on-strength” behavior that capped further upside. A converter in Jiangsu noted: “We did top up when sentiment improved, but only for confirmed film schedules—anything more is risky with new capacity still ramping.”

Supply-side dynamics remained the dominant short-term variable, and January’s operating environment turned progressively favorable. Maintenance among domestic EVA producers was limited, operating rates recovered, and newly started capacity was reportedly running steadily, lifting domestic output versus December. Meanwhile, import arrivals were lower in January, which offered some marginal relief on the pricing front, but not enough to offset the pace of domestic supply growth.

A key supply inflection point was Yulong Petrochemical’s 300 kt/y EVA/LDPE swing unit, which started trial operations on January 18 and reportedly produced on-spec LDPE (LDPE-2420K) in its first run. The unit is designed to cover higher-end applications—PV encapsulation, premium foam, wire & cable, and functional films—implying that once it switches to EVA production, availability could rise further and intensify competition in the most volume-sensitive segments.

On the demand side, January strength was uneven and seasonal. PV demand improved tactically on the expectation that the Q1 “window effect” (prior to April 1, 2026) could pull forward module exports and raise short-term film order intensity. Other traditional applications, including foam and cable, also showed a classic pre-holiday spike, as downstream players built inventory to cover production interruptions, potential trucking constraints, and holiday shutdowns.

However, this restocking impulse faded quickly as the holiday approached. With replenishment largely completed and some small-to-mid converters opting for earlier shutdowns, inquiries thinned and spot negotiations lost traction. A foam converter in South China commented, “After the first round of buying, orders didn’t keep up—so we shifted back to hand-to-mouth. No one wants to hold expensive inventory into a long break.”

Structurally, the PV policy change is likely to reshape (not just lift) EVA demand over time. The cancellation of export rebates is widely seen as accelerating industry consolidation and product upgrading in PV modules—pushing exporters toward higher-performance, higher-premium offerings (e.g., N-type TOPCon and HJT). This, in turn, could increase the pull for alternative encapsulant solutions (such as POE film and EPE (EVA/POE/EVA) co-extruded film) and gradually compress the addressable space for conventional single-layer EVA in higher-end PV applications. In practical terms, that suggests the EVA market may see more pronounced “application bifurcation”: stronger demand for higher-spec grades and more competitive pressure on commoditized volumes.

Did you know Townsend publishes Monthly resin prices?  Request a complimentary copy of the Plastic Market Monthly, EVA Market Intelligence Monthly or Brazilian Price Report -  Learn More customercare@townsendsolutions.com

‍